ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Welcome to the London After Midnight Community! Click here to join! It's free! If you have questions or problems registering just send an email to info (at) londonaftermidnight (dot) com
Search this Topic:
Posts: 6729
Mar 24 11 3:36 AM
still think it's too extreme. Why must people be deprived of listening to music for free AT ALL? Then we could also agree that people have no right to read a book for free or to look at a painting reproduction for free?
Our Soviet motto was "Art belongs to people". Art shouldn't be luxury items for the well-off only. Ability and necessity to consume "spiritual food" distinguishes people from animals. Should we consume only material things if we don't have spare money? What's SO wrong in listening to something on YouTube (it's not people's fault that there's nothing worth listening on official radio channels!) to call these people criminals?
Share This